So is there justice irrespective of perspective?
Is the ruthless killing of prey to eat just? This is more a question of integrity, another article for another day.
What is the meaning of justice?
As you can see the meaning runs the gamut roughly based on righteousness and being just but can also mean upholding the law.
There’s the rub.
Laws aren’t necessarily just, and upholding them isn’t necessarily justice therefore. Semantics too I know but there is an overall principle here, truth.
Really what this article has to say is that there is rarely justice in a legal system based on laws so arcane and prolific deciphering righteousness is all but impossible. This legal system is a high bidder system that delivers outcomes based on who can afford to take the ball to the hoop. Dealmaking and posturing. (The law says, bust a deal and face the wheel. Beyond Thunderdome, Made Max.
Simple and elegant.)
Justice comes not from law, or successful prosecution or defense, but from an internal commitment to a quality of being guided by truth. Motivation to fight for justice is commensurate with this commitment.
Amazingly enough deciphering these meanings comes back to my favorite tree, the truth.
One finds that within this legal system haggling over a result leaves the concept, the principle of truth out of the process. The truth becomes irrelevant.
The Truth Will Set You Free