Archive for February, 2007

Mirrors of Reality

Tuesday, February 27th, 2007

Of course this assumes such a thing as reality. Philosophizing is a real pain when one agrees that nothing exists. However, we all can assume certain givens, and then proceed happily.

So there is reality. I certainly don’t agree with that scenario but how am I going to do a piece on mirrors of something that doesn’t exist? Hold on, I’m having a thought. (Yahoo Serious, Young Einstein).

So the mirrors would have to fit nicely in the category of things that aren’t real but reflect real things.

Dream are a shadow, of something real. (Gulpilil’s character in The Last Wave.)

So how did I wind up on dreams?

Free association. Dreams are made up of the brain’s interpretation of reality in a reflective way despite being largely construed as meaningful information being perceived by the sensitive types.

Dream time is real, a real reflection.

Nearly An Artist

Saturday, February 24th, 2007

Having occasion to peruse an old letter from a father to a daughter I happened upon a litany of excuses for parenting behaviors.

There was talk of voluntary poverty, a sort of activism spirit, and a comment about being nearly artists.

What the?

Nearly an artist?

Hilarious.

Under The Oak

Saturday, February 24th, 2007

Listening to a friend of mine going on about how he could spend 365 days a year under an oak or he could spend 365 days a year working his butt off and either way wind up with nothing prompted a response.

I said, yes, but you forget the huge sense of satisfaction derived from. . . .

Sitting under the oak.

He was pleased.

Achieving Nothing

Wednesday, February 21st, 2007

Not as easy as it appears.

This is typically construed as a downer, a negative, something lacking.

The essence of achieving nothing is anything but.

Of course, as is the problem with all beer (Young Einstein, Yahoo Serious), one needs to define terminology to be speaking in the same context as everyone else.

So define achieving.

Reaching a goal maybe? Creating something? Earning some dollars? “He achieved greatness” for example would mean he became great. So lets agree that achieving means to reach something tangible or intangible but definable.

So define nothing. (Fine, end of story.)

No, I will.

Nothing is the ultimate subject of this site on the meaning of life perspectives and values and as such is much more than the lack of something, or the absence of all.

Nothing can be a state of peace, contentment, enlightenment, rest, ease, calm and emptiness.

Nothing has meaning without point of view.

Nothing is being.

Being nothing.

So achieving nothing in one context is equated to spiritual and all being enlightenment. In another may be achieving the ability to let go of productivity and begin to value nothing in particular.

In this context, the context of this web site on the meaning of life, achieving nothing is highly respected and a goal of the enlightened ones.

Time, I Have No Concept of Time

Sunday, February 18th, 2007

The biggest problem, or challenge, or “issue”, with guitar is making time to play.

If that is an issue then you aren’t committed. You may be committed to an asylum but not to guitar.

So I play frequently but not for enough time. What is that telling me? The lack of commitment is palpable and the result is telling.

So what is the solution to this problem?

Time Management.

Another topic for another day.

Focusing on anything is a challenge when you have a holistic world view.

The Meaning of Meaninglessness

Tuesday, February 13th, 2007

Actually there is no meaning. But if there were. . . .

If there were meaning to no meaning then the meaning would be that not having meaning isn’t necessarily meaningful or meaningless but that the intrinsic meaning has within it the hidden meaning that isn’t visible to the meaning blind or meaning impaired or those who choose not to grant meaning without meaning to.

Underlying Issues and Subterfuge

Saturday, February 10th, 2007

Cutting to the core issue, keeping to the core issue, without being drawn into tangential issues and effects is difficult.

You will find more and more that the truly brilliant human minds have the uncanny ability to see beyond and through the smoke surrounding an issue to identify the core issue of anything at all. Then they keep this clarity of vision relentlessly without compromise.

The complete lack of clarity is prevalent when issues are brought before the courts and debated by governments. The core concept becomes obscured and the scene becomes a negotiation of everyone’s separate and disparate values.

Even in debates or lively discussions this happens.

There is a complete lack of adherence to a concept or principle, also known as values, and everyone seems to have negotiated values for the moment.

This topic is something I referenced once in a song called Nobody’s Home.

The context in the song was that seeing the truth come out and then promptly spun to indicate falsehoods succeeds in making everyone think that they know the truth.

Not a perfect example, point being that any concept or event can be obscured by a clouding issue.

Public rights violations would be a better example. These typically happen by apathetic and corrupt governments.

A right need not be exercised to be important yet rights are eroded on the basis of just such an argument. The core issue of having rights, or the rights existence, is ignored and missed by debating the purpose of the rights, or the current use of the rights, or the extent to which the rights are needed and so on. The right to have a right, used or not, is lost.

Stick to the underlying issue and the rest will sort itself out.

Failure Exists Only In Your Mind

Sunday, February 4th, 2007

A not too original and interesting topic.

So many thoughts and perceptions, so little comprehension outside the walls of my mind.

Success and failure are a long and sordid set of definitions. Due to the fact that a value set of some agreed upon meaningful accomplishment must be present to define these things the potential for misunderstanding in discussing these things is great.

But in practice here in the United States we all tend to agree that success means money and failure means not having money.

Money is a symbol here too. Symbolizing material wealth. Things. Houses, cars, the best of everything. Money is no object. Money is not an issue.

Love is rarely measured in the success definition.

What matters more than money? Love, friendship and understanding. (Stingray. See my favorite shows.)

Now lets examine those two statements about money, money is no object and money is not an issue.

In the real world, where I live, all things are based on truth. The fabrication that is money doesn’t hold a particular interest or meaning. Not to say that money isn’t relevant to life in the US and most of the Western world but only to say that money isn’t real, money is a construct, an agreed upon construct.

So those statements are true for everyone, not just those with money. The difference is in their mind, and ours, or yours, or whoevers.

If you want it, go get it, if you don’t, don’t.

The real danger of understanding all this, that all meaning is given from within, is not having the urge to give anything value at all and hence wind up sitting and staring at the sky watching the wheels, with a big smile upon your face.

So we see that money is a construct and isn’t real then why bother working or playing into that at all? Because you have to as a practical matter, at least in the US.

Otherwise, you have a challenge far greater than that of going along with the material paradigm.

So if money or material wealth equals success than the lack thereof is indeed failure.

But if you examine the basis of success and agree the basis is a construct of no intrinsic value then failure must not exist at all.

If it does, you decided what it was.

And made it so.

Don’t.

Goals and Values – How You Are Getting What You Want

Saturday, February 3rd, 2007

Nived and I discussed this at length once, verbally and in writing.

I have to admit his arguments are compelling, though in the theme of the post on core issues are just a bit outside the concept here.

The more I ponder, the more I see the truth of the idea that our actions, how we live, what we do, display our true intents and desires and ultimately values.

Of course I had reached this conclusion before I ever considered anything at all to do with anything to do with actions speak louder than words. The idea is obvious.

When an idea stands up to scrutiny, then you have something.

Nived points out that just because we may or may not do something to achieve something we desire does not mean we do not value that thing.

Agreed.

Again, that is a little off the track of the core concept, that what we truly desire we seek and achieve. That a failure or a perceived failure to achieve a desired goal is in fact not a failure at all but a complete lack of true commitment to that goal. That what we want we get. That the what of the equation can be unlimited and that the how actually defines the what in actuality, actually.

We are all successful at achieving what we want in the how we do it.

So where is the bottom line? What about starving abused children? What about the holocaust?

All good questions. Remember this is a concept, philosophy, philosophizing.

Concepts are big, not detailed.

The result is the title, you are getting what you want.

But are you getting what you need? The Stones were wrong.