Wanted. Highly educated individual, proficient in computer use, can do anything and everything, must be able to multi-task, willing to work for free with an outside chance of someday advancing to a paid position.
Ah yes. The miracle employee who can do it all, simultaneousy.
This of course is just an illustration serving as an introduction to the topic here. In reality, there is not only no such thing as multi-tasking, it is not possible.
Now I can acknowledge that this argument, and in reality all arguments, are largely semantical. Put that aside, start looking at the truth of it and we will see that literally one can only perform one task at a time. Which is better? Make small steps toward several goals that are in essence never completed, or focus, and complete.
Clearly, in the humdrum bogus world of production actually achieving a goal is much more satisfying than being really “busy” and getting nowhere but putting out loads of sound and fury signifying absolutely squat, to paraphrase Shakey.
Back on topic then we eventually realize, in the pursuit of efficiency, that task management is the best we can do, and that focus is not only good, but highly desirable. Distractions serve only to reduce the probability of completion, yeah, we can get small tasks finished at the expense of the larger holistic goal and one day look around and realize not only did we squander our time but we didn’t get to kick back under the oak while we were at it.
Focus and complete, don’t cheat.